Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human’s life. Discuss both view and give your opinion
Nowadays, numerous parents always think highly of anything from the past for children. However, some individuals claim that people are not need to learn whatever coming from millions of year ago. Personally, I believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human’s life, but people should not apply old objectivity for now.
In the one hand, I strongly claim that people should learn value history based on various reasons. Firstly, history brings people significantly knowledge. It explains for people about origins and construction of the country. If people do not have history, they will not understand about exceptional value. Hence, since schools are established, countries always consider history like as a main subject in order to explain for children about reason why country could exist. For instance, when I was a child, I really hate history because I see it purely boring. But until now, after learning history, I realized about wonderful worth that made me extended knowledge. Moreover, learning history is the way of improving self-awareness. People would be proud of their country since then having awareness to preserve and protect their country. However, many young people tend to devastate historical sites because they are not appreciate about their importance. Thus, anything coming from the past makes people understand deeply about sustainable worth. For example, learning Vietnam history in order to know about hero country. Or learning Japan history, people could know country about modern machinery.
In the other hand, appreciating ancient value is definitely important. But people should not apply outdated thinking in their life today since they could slow down social development. For instance, in the past, men could marry a large of wife at the same time but women only could marry one husband. That is purely nonsense and unfair to women. Thus, people should inherit significant value and develop a modern thinking in order that they catch up with today trend.
In conclusion, I completely approve of learning anything from the past for life today but people should not insist on maintaining outdated thinking
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-20 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 84 | view |
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 95
- People are living in a “throwaway society”, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 67
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sport. Why is it? Is it a negative or positive development? 56
- Some people believe that the only purpose of films is to entertain. Others say films should have educational value. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 78
- tell about your job 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to value'
Suggestion: to value
...strongly claim that people should learn value history based on various reasons. First...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 922, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'appreciated'.
Suggestion: appreciated
...e historical sites because they are not appreciate about their importance. Thus, anything ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36257309942 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65383699418 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8378858972 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3636363636 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287348967415 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860657544016 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824695191346 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216695564053 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106064334211 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.