People have different views on the subject of history. Some insist that it is only a waste of time to review the past experiences of human race whereas others argue that learning history is still worthwhile. From my point of view, it is certainly true that by studying history we can avoid making the same mistakes as well as percieve our world that is full of secrets.
On the one hand, some say that there is no need to learn past experiences. First, they cite to advanced technologies we have achieved which can help us in every field. For example, in medicine, vaccines and effective drugs had been invented to fihht against incurable disieases like cholera, cancer. Such improvements can be seen in every area of our life, contributing to the high level of standards. Furthermore, they propose, artificial intelligence can help us predict the future of our life, thus leaving no need to consider the past. For instance, in finance, many forecasts of economic growth are made by AI through its algorithm, making it more precise than in the past when economists gathered data by looking in the previous years.
On the other hand, opponents of this view strongly assert that we would not achieve current developments if we did not consider the past failures. On of the errors we learned from the past is that conflicts and wars cannot bring advancements in our life. As a result of this, we created peacekeeping and cooperative organisations like United Nations which have been influencing every people in the world. Otherwise, the progress we are making now in every fields could not be feasible. Moreover, we can understand our life better if we study history of life. To illustrate, we have found answers to our common questions like how did our earth form. Therefore, this has given us insights into the origins of our life.
In conclusion, I believe that it is beneficial to explore our history since it helps us to further improve our life.
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 78
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologist claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes and 61
- Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a workplace every day Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages 61
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...t is only a waste of time to review the past experiences of human race whereas others argue that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 58, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...some say that there is no need to learn past experiences. First, they cite to advanced technolog...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the other hand, opponents of this view strongly assert that we would not achiev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85074626866 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70793492566 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1664004016 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5882352941 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5294117647 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32375648017 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1047481753 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0740464720562 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197682729267 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493565997836 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.