Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Some individuals assume that inadequate waste from homes is recycled. They have the notion that the only way to increase recycling is for the supreme authority to make a mandatory obligation. From my perspective, I completely do not compromise with that statement and I will give my own opinion in this essay.
It is understandable why several people say that making compulsory obligations is the only method to increase recycling. To begin with, laws which are enacted by the government make the citizens adhere to the law. If someone objects to the regulations, they will be given a penalty varying from small fines to community service such as cleaning the park or even imprisonment or repeat offenders as a deterrent. Moreover, it enables the community to be enhanced and improve the quality of life, which also contributes to tackling some environmental issues because everyone has the general fear of being punished by the administrative institutions and made to pay a huge amount of money for their fault.
However, this action seems to be impossible in some way, so instead of passing some laws to compel people to recycle, we should raise public awareness about environmental issues and encourage people to recycle more of their household waste. I believe, children from an early age must be taught to recycle and reuse useful materials and companies should also make goods that last longer. Moreover, we should reduce the amount of waste we produce which is a result of our consumer culture. For example, if something in our house breaks, we throw it away and buy a new one instead of repairing it.
In conclusion, there are several risky consequences of compulsory obligation because it is obvious that people find it extremely frustrating to follow strict laws, so other methods should be encouraged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The bar chart provides information about how often people in the USA spent ate fast food from 2003 to 2013 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The picture illustrates the disparity of a park named Grange Park between 1920 and today 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...datory obligation. From my perspective, I completely do not compromise with that ...
^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... not compromise with that statement and I will give my own opinion in this essay....
^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... recycle more of their household waste. I believe, children from an early age mus...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89232701394 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.3788698945 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314731182927 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10731733615 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817278973763 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167609632609 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859354852008 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.