Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Recently, owing to the problem of Global Warming, people are becoming aware of their actions on environment. One of the many ways to reduce our impact on nature in to recycle our garbage, so that it decreases our carbon footprint. However, many say that our efforts towards recycling are inadequate. Hence, the government should step in and make it a legal obligation to recycle. I completely agree with the notion that government should make laws that push people towards recycling.
Firstly, recycling, as mentioned earlier, is good for our environment. Many people, despite the knowledge of recycling, refuse to recycle simply because they find tiresome and troublseome. A law, in this case, will motivate them to recycle, due to the fact that they will not want the unintended consequences of breaking the law. For example, in city of Wakad in India, the garbage truck would not pick up the garbage, if it was not properly segregated until the proper authorities were notified and said houses or buildings penalised. This caused a change in attitude of people and more of them began following the law.
Secondly, a law can be made such that houses are given incentives like reduction of certain tax or perhaps a discount. Such a law requiring them to recycle will inspire them do it anyway, regardless of their will. For instance, in small town of Sangamner, a town in India, the municipal corporation gave one percent discount on water tax for all the residents who recycled. After this initiative, the number of people recycling increased significantly. Moreover, after few years the people asked the corporation instead of giving discount, use the money to clean the city riverfront, while still recycling, of thier own volition.
In conclusion, I believe it is our duty, as an individual and a society, to abate the damage we have done to our environment. Sometimes individual efforts are not enough. This is when the government should play its role in improving the social structure of society with the help of law.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-10 | ThHuong | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-19 | paniz_kiani | 56 | view |
- " Prevention is better than cure". Researching and treating diseases is too costly so it would be better to invest in preventive measures.Discuss both sides. 84
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position. 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing your position, be sure to mention the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.People's behavio 50
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 50
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing your position, be sure to mention the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.People's behavio 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion to recycle. I completely agree with the notion that government should make l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01775147929 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81263710573 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3052709059 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2222222222 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250565010635 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742329980252 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494891801774 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133481400487 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624920547525 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.