Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historic objects and works of art by using a computer. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people believe that public museums and art galleries will be unnecessary because we can see ancient objects and works of art via new technology such as computers. While there might be some supporting arguments, I still disagree with this view due to more convincing reasons.
On the one hand, this opinion seems reasonable simply because using a computer could make studying historical objects and arts to become cheap and convenient. To illustrate, many people see ancient objects and arts which pay for travelling costs and entrance fees in the museums and art galleries. Hence, people who use technology might improve study performance and achieve career success
In spite of the arguments above, I highly go against this view for the following reasons. Firstly, most tourists prefer a real experience. For example, these tourists often travel to public attractions, such as museums and art galleries, after they see them on social media, including Facebook and TV. Thus, many websites and other online sources may encourage people to go to museums and art galleries.
Another reason is that studying arts and history via new technology such as computers could be boring. For instance, students who study practical materials often have better performance. As a result, many schools and universities provide more practical lessons for their students
In conclusion, although I recognize possible arguments to accept the discussed view, there are more convincing reasons to believe this idea is unreasonable
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The development of science and technology benefit our life However scientists cannot find effective solutions to the problems they created To what degree do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The charts below show the percentage of working time in office spent on different tasks in the UK 1990 and 2000 67
- The pie chart shows different types of transport crossing the bridge in the UK in 1965 1985 and 2005 67
- In modern age some people believe that it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons to believe this idea is unreasonable
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 238.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38655462185 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73304390526 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609243697479 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7142617176 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375851910209 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134268419112 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116431228381 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195464603397 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154121081878 0.056905535591 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.