Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
One of the highly controversial issues today relates to whether governments should control the design of new buildings in urban areas or investors should design buildings freely as they feel suitable. In this essay, I will examine this question from both points of view and then explain why I agree with the former opinion.
On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the government in big cities should regulate the design of buildings which are newly developed. The main reason for believing this is that they have a responsibility to secure the safety of general citizens. Architectures designed without legal safety standards are likely to break down sooner or later. This endangers residents and visitors in the city, which can be prevented by adequate instruction by the government. It is also possible to say that governmental controls are necessary to preserve a beautiful scenery that the city originally has. Freely designed buildings can disfigure such a city view, harming the value of the city. One good illustration of this is Kyoto city. It has strict regulations for colors and the height of buildings, which contribute to maintaining the traditional Japanese atmosphere in the ancient capital of Japan.
On the other hand, it is also possible to make the opposing case. It is often argued that people spending money should be allowed to design new buildings in a way they feel is adequate. People often have this opinion because it can have a favorable impact on the local economy. These days, scenic views in cities are increasingly important in tourism with the popularity of social media, such as Instagram and Tik Tok. Therefore, unique architecture can contribute to attracting many tourists from all over the world, boosting the local economy. If the government imposes strict restrictions on the design of buildings, the city will be less appealing visually, which may lead to a significant loss of income.
In conclusion, I believe that both arguments are convincing. On balance, however, I tend to believe that the design of buildings should be regulated legally from the viewpoint of safety and preservation of city views rather than allowing people spending money to design freely from an economic perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | Nanddy | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | mirsohails | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ndiep | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-03 | jk1692 | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurants in a downtown business district 55
- Art and music have a greater contribution to society than science and math Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that there should be strict laws to control the amount of noise a person makes because of the disturbance it causes to people Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 61
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both views and give your 73
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14945652174 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84518915214 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540760869565 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6253312534 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.277777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356416556741 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101879043066 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10672364518 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233076693804 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225038688078 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14945652174 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84518915214 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540760869565 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6253312534 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.277777778 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356416556741 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101879043066 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10672364518 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233076693804 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225038688078 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.