Some people feel that it is always wrong to keep animals in captivity, for instance in zoos. Other people say that there are benefits for animals and humans. Discuss both sides of this debate, and give your personal view.
Keeping animals in zoological parks always have their pros and cons. While it can have some benefits for both animals and humans, some people believe that it is against animal rights. Many arguments are supporting both views, those for and those against to captivation of animals, as I will outline in this essay.
On the one hand, some people including environmental conservationists and scientists believe that keeping animals in conservative situations have a lot of advantages for both humans and animals. Firstly, experts can <span style="font-size: 19.36px;">accommodate </span>convenient circumstances for endangered and scarce species to stay alive. For example, some Iranian tiger will become extinct soon, but they can be alive and nurtured under the supervision of experts for a long time. Secondly, in zoological parks, people especially children can gain knowledge about various types of animals. Finally, and most important, because of such zoos, people learn to respect nature and take care of it to prevent wild animals from dying out.
On the other hand, some groups think that keeping animals in the zoo
is like keeping them in prison and it is against their rights. In other words, animals should live in their natural habitat and feel freedom. Furthermore, this captivation can have some repercussions for them. For instance, due to the limitation of animals realm in the zoo, they may feel depressed and consequently lose some of their abilities like trapping their prey. I believe that the captivation of animals in anyways is a controversial issue; however, some wild animals are at risk of extinction and too vulnerable, so they need special conservation.
In conclusion, although keeping animals in captivity have some drawbacks on their l life, its benefits for both humans and animals outweigh to these disadvantages. But I believe that it is a government's responsibility to use experts to make a better environment for wild animals to live as their natural habitat.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 78
- today more attention is paid to men sports the women what are the cause? is it a positive or negative development? 73
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people. Some people think younger leader would be better. Do u agree or disagree? 61
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.Discuss both these views 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
...think that keeping animals in the zoo is like keeping them in prison and it is a...
^^
Line 15, column 192, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...sadvantages. But I believe that it is a governments responsibility to use experts to make a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3880126183 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30856932443 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529968454259 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0436007175 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4666666667 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374497269667 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14065607759 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795485555348 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235426583826 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495989343908 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.