Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is indeed obvious that one of the reasons contributing to the deterioration of the environment comes down to discarded plastics from the packaging of goods. A question has been raised that if they are good producers who should bear the responsibility towards this problem. In contrast, by all accounts, the issue can be lightened by controlling the consumption.
It cannot be denied that with the popularization of e-commerce, the consuming habit of customers has been transformed, which turns online shopping into in demand. It is worth underlining that not only were goods wrapped in plastics as they used to be, but it is also covered by carton boxes or styrofoam. As a consequence, the environment has to face up to a triple-increase in the number of litter thrown away from packaging. Therefore, it would be correct to assume that consumers should raise their awareness of buying behavior. To make this become a reality, there are many ways such as buying goods from stores directly or reprocessing boxes or plastics.
On the other hand, as for manufacturers, the reason for expanding the number of the packaging of goods concerns economics. On account of the demand of consumers, manufacturers are required to mass-produce products covered by boxes, plastics, or soft foam. It can be observed that these materials are cheap and convenient, however, it takes them a long time to decompose. The primary reason for this attitude is that most producers take into consideration maximizing the profit outweighing conserving the ecosystem. Once companies pay more attention to methods to lessen the non-biodegradable materials such as substituting organic packaging, this will turn the environment into greener and greener.
In conclusion, if this issue continues to endure, our planet will be destroyed in many ways. Therefore, from my perspective, not only manufacturers but also every individual needs to unite in order to conserve and recover the ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | quynhu | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-17 | RkmsU | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | viviannguyen | 61 | view |
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 87
- the graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 to 2007 78
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 78
- A person spends most of his or her time at the workplace and life becomes meaningless when there is no job satisfaction To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, as for, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28343949045 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2221950397 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582802547771 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3704990535 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.6 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122172914654 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386535341201 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423182227807 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0697058720726 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033692433522 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.