It is frequently that producers and shopping malls should take a duty for minimizing merchandises bags, whilst others disagree and say that commodities should be stopped purchasing by buyers. In my opinion, suppliers are more affective to encourage citizen to reduce packs.
On the one hand, shoppers are capable of creating a radical change in the production process and sales behaviors of retailers. If producers and retail businesses pay too much attention to their items’ packaging, the clients may feel goods are consequently bulky that they do not have much demand to offer. From that, sales of these distributors can fall down easily. For this reason, they ought to change their marketing strategies as well as their manufacturing process. Moreover, consumers become the best factors to maintain businesses. Thanks to them, manufactures and supermarkets can have their own values and motivations to boost their quality of goods, especially in their wraps. Thus, these will raise their awareness about protecting the environment among producers and the public and simply retain their target customers.
On the other hand, I believe that the expenses of production and delivery can be declined. This is due to the fact that when a company do not allocate money on bags, they can save a great amount of currency which is not indispensable. It not only do not affect too much to the product’s quality, on the contrary also improve that firm’s profits. In addition, the impression of dwellers in the images of retails or distribution employments will be enhanced due to how thy change their wrapping into eco-friendly things. From that point, they will also attract a large section of environmentally-conscious shoppers and their receipts as well as reputation improve dramatically. For instance, Chanel, which is a French domestic brand, extremely successful by using environmentally friendly packaging in every product. That helps this brand become one of the first label go green which develop society avoiding the harmfulness of pollution.
In conclusion, while people who buy goods affect a lot to manufacturing businesses, my firm conviction is that distributors should shoulder an accountability for controlling the quantity of overused packs. Furthermore, this can raise awareness about saving the Earth greener to residents.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42349726776 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16708154399 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6246084029 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.277777778 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5555555556 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121810272721 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318002221409 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039873950297 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078544940655 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318877750896 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.