Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it; however, others prefer to give money to the national or private charities.
Discuss both views and give your own opinions.
These days, many people would prefer to provide direct supporting actions to those in need within local areas, whereas others opt to donate money to either private or public charities. This essay will disscuss both standpoints and present my own opinion.
On the one hand, immediate and direct assisstance to people locally helps build up a great sense of attachment among people. This may be because when visiting each household with a view to giving help, people may have a chance to have informal talks, which helps express their care, consideration and the spirit of willingness to help each other. For example, residents in a community who raise funds to help a particular household who was redundant due to Covid-19 pandemic, and come to encourage the family to overcome adversities. As a result, this not only helps that family financially, but at the same time, also create a sense of attachment and community inside both receivers and givers.
On the other hand, I believe that donating money to national and private charity centers is a more effective approach due to its large-scale nature. To be specific, money raised by these charities often come from various sources, including individuals and private and public enterprises. This money is managed by either the government or private charity organization, who are also responsible for allocating properly money to people in difficulties in different areas. For example, people from many parts of Viet Nam donated a large amount of money to national funds, which was then given to people living in regions affected by the disastrous thunderstorm last year. As it can be seen, the public can join hands to help even those they do not know and those who live in the places they have never came to, which contributes to a greater, and therefore, more efficient support.
To conclude, while giving support locally and directly may bring people a great sense of community, I still believe that raising funds to charities will be a better choice, by which they gather more money to help people on a larger scale.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-13 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-13 | Khanhu010101 | 78 | view |
- Multi cultural societies in which there is a mixture of different ethnic people bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country To what extent do you agree 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The map show changes between 1960 and now in the Station street Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 61
- In some countries around the world men and women are having babies late in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
... who live in the places they have never came to, which contributes to a greater, and...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66957544031 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563583815029 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.6902922593 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.166666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395481955243 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130785761836 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608996520591 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232919826336 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237671149852 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.