Some people prefer to watch live performances
from their home on TV or online, others prefer
to be present at the event and experience it
live. Discuss both ways and give your opinion.
Lifestyle has undergone dramatic changes over a couple of decades. Presently, in this modern world, everyone has different thinking about watching their favourite singers,actors,players and so on. Therefore, some people have tendency to watch live perfomances of their favourite stars or role model at their home on television as well as online on youtube. By contrast, others assert that watching live perfomances by visiting at the host places is a spectacular idea. Here,I would like to account for both sides with my own perception.
There are manifold points to shore up the former view. First and foremost, nowadays, people are passionate to watch live concerts at their home on television or internet due to traffic congestion. For instance, the number of vehicles which is elevating swiftly leads traffic menaces and therefore people have to face multifarious problems in order to reachh at cinemas or PVR's, live event. Consequently, such masses tend to watch perfomances on television instead of presenting at the live events. Apart from it, watching perfomances by television could be fruitful to save the precious time.
Numerous points can be mentioned to support the second view. Initially, people
want to have more fun of perfomances by presenting at the live events. To be specific, they prefer to be present at the host places in order to meet with their favourite celebrities. Thus, they give much preference to live concerts rather than television or other sources. Furthermore, they can relish a lot by shouting, hooting and so forth at the live events.
From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, some people have lack of interest, financial instability and thus they love to watch perfomaances by television at home. On the other hand, others have conflicting views. Hence, I think that people should watch perfomances according to their interest, financial budgets, affection or feelings as well.
To recapitulate, thinking of people has been totally changed towards live perfomances. Thence,ait is an advisable for individuals to look supreme comforts,interest or fun in order to watch perfomances whether they are at home or live events.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-04-17 | NIRMAL SINGH | 56 | view |
2016-08-20 | Dinesh Budania | 10 | view |
- Some people prefer to watch live performancesfrom their home on TV or online, others preferto be present at the event and experience itlive. Discuss both ways and give your opinion. 10
- It is better for children if the whole families ( e.g aunts , uncles and grandparents ) are involved in the children's upbringing , rather than their fathers and mothers only . Do you agree or disagree with this opinion ? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , actors
...g about watching their favourite singers,actors,players and so on. Therefore, some peop...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , I
... host places is a spectacular idea. Here,I would like to account for both sides wi...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport the second view. Initially, people want to have more fun of perfomances by ...
^^^
Line 10, column 94, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ait
...changed towards live perfomances. Thence,ait is an advisable for individuals to look...
^^^^
Line 10, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , interest
...for individuals to look supreme comforts,interest or fun in order to watch perfomances wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'apart from', 'for instance', 'i think', 'as well as', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.27 0.247107183377 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.1575 0.155533422707 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0925 0.0946595960268 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0475 0.0501214627716 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0425 0.0437548338989 97% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12 0.122226691241 98% => OK
Participles: 0.045 0.0403226058552 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08766979581 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.05 0.0326793684256 153% => OK
Particles: 0.0025 0.00163938923432 152% => OK
Determiners: 0.0475 0.0861772015684 55% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125 0.021408717616 58% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0025 0.011925033212 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2198.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 346.0 316.048096192 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.35260115607 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393063583815 0.374742101984 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.303468208092 0.28420135186 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.239884393064 0.203846283523 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.173410404624 0.137316102897 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08766979581 2.80594681477 110% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.037074148 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540462427746 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 58.4232639 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0891783567 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.4761904762 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0466952626 49.517814964 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 127.492653851 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4761904762 20.7743622355 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.809523809524 0.814263465372 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.99599198397 125% => OK
Readability: 46.8230112854 49.1944974215 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.75757575758 1.69124875643 104% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381552231771 0.332605444948 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0695927950934 0.102741220458 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0452814231839 0.0668466124924 68% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.49404830988 0.534860350844 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156297060002 0.148594505496 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126342721776 0.134430193775 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685177570728 0.0742795772207 92% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.237557268712 0.324371583561 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0529276555401 0.0638462369009 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220042378928 0.228012699653 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609437713879 0.058150111329 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.68436873747 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.41683366733 263% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 1.9629258517 306% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.