Some people say that because of the internet, it is no longer necessary to learn facts about some subjects like history and science.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that after the of the internet, people can be accessed to knowledge easily. I disagree with this assertion because although many facts are learned with regards to science and history through the internet, some facts have to be verified by experts such as professors or teachers because of the reliability and without learning facts scientists are not probably making new discoveries.
To begin with, many untrustworthy facts are spread over the internet owing to the freedom of sharing on the internet. As a result of that people have been forwarded in a wrong way, in particular, historical facts. Perhaps the main reason is for those people who share into the internet are biased of their own national identification, this leads to the people having false historical facts. However, if people pick it up these sorts of facts from experts such as historian, they will be giving true facts with pieces of evidence. A good illustration of this is that research has proven that many contexts of the internet are included in highly wrong knowledge because of the providers.
On the other hand, there are also strong arguments for the idea that some people want to assimilate the fundamental of facts such as scientific knowledge in order to develop themselves in this subject. Perhaps the strongest argument in favour of this viewpoint is in the area of so as to become a professor, people have to learn facts and then after making combination these facts which obsolete and new discovered, they are more likely to make a new breakthrough otherwise nobody is able to become a professor, hence, learning facts is essential criteria in the way of making new invest
In conclusion, it seems to me that regardless of the internet is an indisputable source in this century, there are numbers of unreliable facts on the internet, and learning facts is one of the vital factors for the researchers.
- It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting training course to bring their children up To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- NO FUTURE FOR RADIO 73
- It is necessary for parents to attend a parenting training course to bring their children up To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extends do you agree or disagree 73
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sult of that people have been forwarded in a wrong way, in particular, historical facts. Perha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...our of this viewpoint is in the area of so as to become a professor, people have to lear...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...criteria in the way of making new invest In conclusion, it seems to me that regar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 229, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the vital factors for the researchers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, then, as to, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95950155763 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77751321029 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510903426791 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.833323556 49.4020404114 319% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 176.888888889 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.6666666667 20.7667163134 172% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.4444444444 7.06120827912 219% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268291723821 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107780417904 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667033222882 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172612742065 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623347034031 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.