Nowadays, people argue how to make our society healthier. One thinks, that developing new gyms, playgrounds and stadiums should help, when others calling for different improvements as they do not think, new sports places will help. This essay will discuss both sides of view and provide examples. With increasing number of obese people, new sports areas should help, however, people have to be educated, how to live healthily.
Our metropolitan areas are filled up with plenty of fitness centres, offering a range of classes for the public. In this era, everybody can choose sports activity suiting him or her. Unfortunately, in private gyms and sports centres, some people can find this unaffordable and give up. If government develop more sports facilities across the cities, such an outdoor gym, playground, stadium, people who can not afford membership in any private facility, could find the way how to maintain their physic health and became more active.
On the other hand, our generation is living in rush. Many people skip their breakfast and in hurry just having lunch in one of the fast foods located almost everywhere. Having lunch in fast food is affordable, food is tasty and almost available immediately to eat. It is generally known, that this food is unhealthy and removing breakfast from our daily routine as well, people follow this habit. Education of health lifestyle is the essential part of our public health and government should invest more effort and money to educate people. With good habits in nutrition, we can decrease the percentage of illness caused by unhealthy food and lifestyle.
To summarise, there is no one right way how to improve health in our society. Health lifestyle is process dependent on many factors and any of these factors cannot be missed.
- International travel is cheaper and more convenient than ever. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? 73
- the bar chart below gives information about the percentage of the population living in urban areas in different parts of the world. 78
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12244897959 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57937978117 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615646258503 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.341181861 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.125 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 7.06120827912 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224152083427 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688545413466 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421426010389 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125028485924 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181124429906 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.