Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
The issue raised in the question is a bone of contention on which suggestions may vary. Among those points, arise the idea that upgrading and adding more sports equipment. Diametrically opposed to that, some people put forward the view that authorities should make more maneuvers to fully tackle the problem. Although both sides may present equally valid arguments to support themselves, the latter’s opinion is more appealing to me.
Taking up sports can reduce much stress from work and academic pursuits. Since exercises produce a hormone named endorphin, which is a natural painkiller, the stress level can dwindle immediately, thanks to the unique function of the chemical. Another supporting objective that can be listed out is that the life expectancy of people who take up sports daily is astonishingly increased. For example, swimming can curtail the amount of fat and control the blood flow inside our bodies. Swimmers can also gain durability and flexibility through the synchronous movements of limbs to create the swimming motions. In my opinion, although these views can be seen as the actual solution of the problem, they are only one-sided, as many sports can only be taken up by wealthy people or members of privileged classes.
Granted, there are two measurements that can be taken up to solve the thorny issue. First of all, public health can be ameliorated through public propaganda and education. Cite one example, ‘the disease of a century’ AIDS can be avoided by people who are well educated. If people use protection during sex, STDs can be easily avoidable. Secondly, governments should levy taxes on junk food as fast food is the main reason leading to obesity at an early age. Only when we increase the price of fried food, people can buy them less and less.
In a nutshell, lessening public diseases is a hard problem to entirely solve owing to the fact that there are classes of people in the society. In my opinion, the package of measurements which mentioned above can be the key to solve the nuisance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people say trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns. While others believe housing facilities should be built instead. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- These days, in many countries, fewer and fewer people want to become teachers, particularly in secondary schools. What are the reasons for this, and how could the problem be solved? 57
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73855592992 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614705882353 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8153861261 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8888888889 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100854959028 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339035733399 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380555061597 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0642120406646 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184434630937 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.