some people say that formal writing test is not necessarily suitable to the modern education system
Evaluation methods of a student’s performance have always been an area of contention around the world. Many think that this can be done by continual assessment of their speaking and listening skill. On the other hand, people are also in favor of writing skill. I believe the latter is a more appropriate option.This can be proved by analyzing the fact that speaking and listening skills can ignore wrong grammar and also mis-spelling in contrast to writing skill, you can’t hide mistakes. This controversial issue should be viewed and analyzed from multiple perspectives
First and foremost,writing gives voice to our inner thoughts and allows us to share them. It focuses students on comprehension, developing their voice or perspective, and communicating this perspective to others. For example, students are participating in the writing contest, after reading the topic, students need to brainstorm ideas and give creativity to be able to convince the examiner.
On the other hand, writing which is a mirror reflected the real possibility of the writer through hand-writing, literary style and common grammatical errors. Thereby, student can learn from experience and adjust the arrangement of evidence or ideals for an essay. For instance, . In an electronic world where verbal communication has become less frequently used, learning to write in a cohesive, structured manner allows individuals to convey their thoughts effectively which make examiner easily comprehend
In conclusion, although speaking and listening ability can assess students’ performance somewhat, I believe that writing skills make a contribution to improve not only the development of mentality but also the persuasive ability
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-01 | minhpencil | 11 | view |
- some people say that formal writing test is not necessarily suitable to the modern education system 11
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...the latter is a more appropriate option.This can be proved by analyzing the fact tha...
^^^^
Line 1, column 581, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and analyzed from multiple perspectives First and foremost,writing gives voice t...
^^^^
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , writing
...tiple perspectives First and foremost,writing gives voice to our inner thoughts and a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ce or ideals for an essay. For instance, . In an electronic world where verbal com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65250965251 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22036787196 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637065637066 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 112.430400877 49.4020404114 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.4 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0568750278924 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0245487866334 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037435671186 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0341076896317 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00861938199341 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.