Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like Science and Technology are more important than History.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There are different projects being taught in school within the contemporary era. Although each subject has its own importance, different contemplations exist among local people; some opine history is more prominent than Scientific and technological lessons while others think completely opposite. Each two groups depict various reasons why they are thinking so. The former individuals say history in terms of acquiring valuable knowledge from the previous generation is more prominent; alternatively, the latter group take technology as a more prioritized lesson regarding the era now we are living in since it is tied with computer and tech developments. This essay will elaborate both parts whilst I do agree with the latter opinion.
On one hand history seems to be a wonderful heritage to prevent further same issues getting triggered. To illustrate, humans are the only smart species who got used to making themselves better in terms of life standards and environmental developments. This approach has initiated from a long protracting period that fortunately some of the events has been written down by histories and locals. Regarding eye-catching inquiries these articles and books bring, it would also be beneficial to be taught in schools that consequently result in gaining knowledge about previous generation and how they used to live. For instance, teaching historians’ occasions and additionally former life styles make pupils alert about extraordinary information describing values and privileges that those people used to take care of. To sum up, history lesson presumed to take the priority over tech-savvy in terms of historic knowledge increases
On the other hand, technology is an inevitable phenomenon that all people would sense during their lives therefore it should be seriously taught in schools from the youngest ages. Clearly, if students are not able to understand the different notions and developments existing around, the sense of dissatisfaction will get triggered that hardly ever can anyone make it stop. Also, it is worth considering that by expanding horizons in this arena, students are to significantly bloom in coming years and working on these related subjects would be reaping the benefits. For instance, Japan is a country which eye-catchingly tries to invest in forming strong infrastructures from early ages by which grown-up citizens could perform. Wonderfully, in terms of innovation and technological related aspects. Therefore, I tend to say that technological subjects seem to be extremely noticeable scope that each dynamic government should take into consideration,
All in all, despite the importance each school subject has, some different perspectives exist among people that some opine history is a greater lesson to be paid attention to while the rest would pick technological-based subjects as a prioritized option. I personally do believe that the second contemplation seems to be more proper as now we are living in an era in which every single accomplishment gets shaped on the basis of this literacy. This essay illustrated both views and some examples were clarified.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-16 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-17 | sahil nain | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | englishessays | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-21 | shalin63 | 84 | view |
- the chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the years 1996 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 contribution as of India s GDP summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant 83
- bar chart 11
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are different projects being taugh...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st I do agree with the latter opinion. On one hand history seems to be a wonder...
^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ong protracting period that fortunately some of the events has been written down by histori...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... terms of historic knowledge increases On the other hand, technology is an inev...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment should take into consideration, All in all, despite the importance each ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2654.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49482401656 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11694817402 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 176.041082164 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585921325052 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0676217346 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.444444444 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249427489561 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650870876056 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651278617004 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153054305817 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542538236212 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
There are different projects being taugh...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st I do agree with the latter opinion. On one hand history seems to be a wonder...
^^^
Line 2, column 331, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ong protracting period that fortunately some of the events has been written down by histori...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... terms of historic knowledge increases On the other hand, technology is an inev...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rnment should take into consideration, All in all, despite the importance each ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, regarding, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2654.0 1615.20841683 164% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49482401656 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11694817402 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 176.041082164 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585921325052 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 832.5 506.74238477 164% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 91.0676217346 49.4020404114 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.444444444 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249427489561 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650870876056 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651278617004 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153054305817 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542538236212 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 141.0 78.4519038076 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.