Some people say that language courses using the internet and allowing you to talk to somebody is a good way to learn language skills. Others, however believe that study in classroom is still the best way of learning. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Trend of learning different languages is gaining prevalence all over the world. Presently, some people assert that learning language using internet which also allows people to communicate with others is a great path whereas others ponder that classroom is a better place to learn instead of internet. Here, I would like to account for both the views with my own perception.
To commence with, there are multifarious points to endorse the former view. First and the foremost, people who learn languages using language websites and language apps provided by internet become proficient in skill. For instance, individuals explore various apps like Esl-lap, Cambly and so on to learn different skills such as speaking, listening, writing and reading of a language. Besides this, people can visit various sites to improve basics like spelling, vocabulary and grammatical rules of a linguistic skill where they can find out worthwhile tips, strategies shared by experts. Role of internet is thus, phenomenal in improving one’s grip over a language skill. Moreover, internet enables individual to talk to foreigners and online tutors in their language. Therefore, conversation with people of other nations helps in improving the ability of a person in language skill. On the other hand, others have contrasting views.
To begin with, numerous points can be mentioned to support the latter view. Initially, classroom provide a healthy and disciplined learning environment to grab the knowledge of a language. To get deeper, learning language in a group of students is lucrative as they can perform in various activities like group discussions, debates, role playing and so on conducted under a suitable environment by a teacher. Apart from it, teacher not only provide instructions but also maintain discipline in the classroom while, on the other hand children can’t even learn with peer groups not even with discipline using internet. Hence, classroom have more suitable ambience to learn language skills with peer groups. Adding to it, the more effective learning of language skill is possible owing to face to face conversations with other classmates and teachers in the classroom whereas online communication is less interesting and impactful. As a result, language learning in a classroom is a more effective way to develop skills.
To conclude, learning language using internet is fruitful idea. However, in my opinion, I still believe that classroom provide better amenities and ambience to learn more about language skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | Harshkaur | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-21 | nehasingla.ns | 73 | view |
- Single young people in many countries leave their parents for study and job and live somewhere else Does this trend have more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Some people think that animal testing is fruitful to human beings while others are against this view point. Discuss both the views and give your opinion. 67
- Single young people in many countries leave their parents for study and job and live somewhere else Does this trend have more advantages than disadvantages 78
- Some people say that language courses using the internet and allowing you to talk to somebody is a good way to learn language skills Others however believe that study in classroom is still the best way of learning Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to face'.
Suggestion: to face
...ing of language skill is possible owing to face to face conversations with other classmates and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, while, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41518987342 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82143238306 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521518987342 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1928689789 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.95 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38428167473 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127215616477 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843603679783 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267000890741 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336090162358 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.