Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In today’s world, environmental issues have been one of the debating ones among people. In terms of these problems, reduced number of living species has been one of them. Some individuals claim that despite this difficulty, there have been lots of significant environmental issues which should be high on the agenda. While, others argue that the main issue has been the loss of specific species. I myself concur with the second opinion based on several reasons which will be clarified later.
To commence with, if some people do not recognize disappeared amount of living things as the core issue, it would have some causes. In their opinion, problems such as global warming or harmful effects of fossil fuels have been more significant that that problem. Since this issue may not have a direct consequence on people’s lifespan, but, for instance, air pollution and warm weather have been more tangible for individuals. Moreover, implementing measures in order to solve this specific problem, could be distracting for experts not to consider and solve other problems immediately. As a result, actions for difficulties which every human could see their adverse results, should be taken first.
On the other hand, another reason has led other individuals to regard the mentioned problem as the main environmental one. By finding solution for this particular problem, they could solve other ones simultaneously. As in nature, all the aspects have been connected to each other, solving one issue may result in solving others. In fact, causes of that problem, could be loss of their habitat by human’s activities such as farming and also threat for their life by contamination of various parts of their food. Since these causes could be for all other issues, other ones would be solved by its solutions.
In conclusion, regarding to both views, I myself consider all the ecological problems as important as each other, because not only have they been interacted, but also lots of their solutions may be similar to one another.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
- The process details designs of a modern landfill for household waste 61
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The charts below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 11
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 318, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ues which should be high on the agenda. While, others argue that the main issue has b...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16616314199 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68733452878 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546827794562 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1071744537 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6875 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186360976976 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730019820558 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050948909738 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119204504894 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0200783852615 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.