Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion

Ever since the advent of the internet, there has been a paradigm shift in the experience of shopping. While most people feel e-commerce as a convenient platform for buying products, others say the opposite. Although I, personally, agree that advancements in technology has improved the shopping experience, I will still examine both views in detail.

The Latest technologies, certainly, have helped with the betterment of buying experience. First of all, e-retailers have made shopping more convenient. As people can purchase products typically from anywhere through their mobile phones, this has saved the time spent exclusively on shopping. Another major benefit of online shopping is that buyers can compare multiple products with ease. Unlike conventional shopping, people have more liberty in researching the quality and price of the products as they would not have to be conscious about the time. These advantages have made more people prefer buying online to supermarkets.

On the contrary, some people outline the disadvantages of these advancements. The primary drawback that people quote is that most of the time the cost of delivery is usually higher than the product itself. As the products are delivered from warehouses which are in different parts of the country, the cost of shipping these products would be higher if the shoppers purchase less expensive products. Daily essentials such as bathing soap, for instance, would be cheaper if people buy it directly from outlets as these shops do not charge shipping charges separately for the item. Similarly, the time taken for delivering the products is another disadvantage. If people are in desperate need of a product such as vegetables, they cannot patiently wait until the product is delivered to them. They would instead prefer to buy it in retail shops directly. If people, however, are more pre-planned and pre-organized they can definitely overcome these drawbacks.

In conclusion, recent technological advancements have made more impact on the way people purchase products. In my view, this trend is, certainly, more advantageous as it has made shopping a more convenient and satisfying experience.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43362831858 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93048212432 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7498845797 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9473684211 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159727214636 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544873481187 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048924574697 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118339222969 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509873729808 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, similarly, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43362831858 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93048212432 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53982300885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7498845797 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9473684211 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8421052632 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159727214636 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544873481187 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048924574697 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118339222969 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509873729808 0.056905535591 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.