Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Undeniably, music plays a crucial role in our lives and eliminates distinctions and differences among various cultures and generations. It symbolises harmony and reflects humanity. I quite agree that music helps bring people from various cultures and generations together.
One of the reasons music excretes the hurdles among different nations and cultures is that people enjoy music from every part of the world, and it speaks the same language, which embodies human emotion, joy, love and sorrow. Music does not need interpretation to be enjoyed and understood as it touches our heart and resonates in our mind. No matter what language we speak or understand, we appreciate the melody and depth of music which is why people of all ages can sit together and enjoy the same music.
Moreover, nations influence each other with the type of music they produce and the type of musical instruments they use. This amalgamation reduces cultural differences and brings people from different cultures and ages to a common platform. For example, many music genres, that we enjoy these days, were derived from multiple nations and cultures and people from all these cultures enjoy and love them.
Music is an art form which is enjoyed by all, and this helps reduce the generation and age gaps among people. For instance, when the national anthem is played, child, adults and elders all tune to the same emotion, which is patriotism, and their unity is stronger than ever. The same can be said when music evokes other emotions like love, sadness and so on. Besides, some music categories are loved by all, and the listeners feel a sense of togetherness in a divine way which is almost absent in other art forms. It not only eliminates age gaps but also the generation and cultural gaps.
In conclusion, music, as a universally accepted and supreme art form, enriches our lives and strengthens the connections between us, regardless of our backgrounds, culture and age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001 16 7 2020 84
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 84
- Some children do not have the natural ability to learn languages Some school should not force children to learn foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'reasons'' or 'reason's'?
Suggestion: reasons'; reason's
...and generations together. One of the reasons music excretes the hurdles among differ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a divine way" with adverb for "divine"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... listeners feel a sense of togetherness in a divine way which is almost absent in other art for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 10.4138276553 288% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05846153846 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.627061715 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553846153846 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1075751214 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287138641389 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103361628999 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836031618194 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16233170449 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605513405674 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.