Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
People have been creating melodies according to their culture and geographical location since the earliest times. An opinion exists that the union of individuals with contrasting views becomes more real with music as a reason. Although I value an individuality in the area of music kinds, JANRES I believe in the uniting effect of music.
On the one hand, sometimes music can aggravate both disagreement and disconnection between fans of not correlated genres. Moreover, it frequently leads to disputes based on the personal preferences, which differs a lot from human to human. Also a culture segmentation among disparate communities is supported by the difference of genres they listen TO. For example, people listening to rap do not have any contact point with classic music admires and therefore it does bring them together, and even vice versa. Thus, the style choice plays a huge role in the elongation highlighting of cultural and maturity level in society.
On the other hand, lovers of the same music type are bonded together on this basis in spite of all differences in their company. Crowd on the concert of a certain artist is one element and all diversities erase in such moment. One band brings together many fans of different ages and cultures, because enjoying a similar music genre comes on the first plan. For instance, study conducted by Culture Research Center says that two individuals with close tastes in music are more likely to become friends for 23%. Hence, the music is a pretty serious reason for people unification and views agreement as well.
To conclude, music can be basis for moral tensions or social fission, while bringing them together are more possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Most career choices demand vocational skills or specialist knowledge However despite this most schools still teach academic subjects such as history or social studies 66
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 11
- Some people enjoy change, and they look forward to new experiences. Others like their lives to stay the same, and they do not change their usual habits.Compare these two approaches to life. Which approach do you prefer? Explain why? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndividuality in the area of music kinds, JANRES I believe in the uniting effect ...
^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lity in the area of music kinds, JANRES I believe in the uniting effect of music...
^^
Line 2, column 240, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...hich differs a lot from human to human. Also a culture segmentation among disparate ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08243727599 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69487336759 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648745519713 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 16.9165116779 49.4020404114 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.285714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277712167775 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821964289308 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460366071197 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153322606229 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461601744333 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.