Some people say music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Music is out of the question one of the best-known tools to help people relax as well as cure some mental illnesses. It is said, that tunes and rhythms are useful to connect people from all walks of life and different age groups. As far as I am concerned, I just partly concur with the statement, given some plausible rebuttals that are going to be discussed in the essay.
On the one hand, on the supporting side, it is indisputable that music plays an important role in terms of forming close ties between individuals. As can be widely recognized, music connects people in such an effective way, especially in a number of concerts and social events. Take the World Cup as an example, sports lovers around the globe gather in big stadiums to sing the theme song of the event during the opening ceremony, which offers happiness and encourages international unity among people. Moreover, music can be found at cultural meetings where visitors get to know the cultures and daily routines of the ethnic minorities. This certainly enhances global connection and dissolves any hurdles such as language barriers and lifestyle differences.
However, the given statement does not always work properly since music is a vast field that involves a variety of genres that suit different groups of people. To be more specific, it is quite rare to capture a child enjoying classical masterpieces which were written in jazz or country styles. In addition, the contents of songs and compositions often vary and aim at different potential listeners. For instance, authors and songwriters are more likely to publish products that meet the demands and tastes of their regular customers so as to ensure their profits. Lastly, it Is worth mentioning the possibility of people using music for nefarious intentions such as offending or criticizing any particular target. In this case, music is no longer a useful tool to bring people together, let alone tear individuals apart.
In conclusion, music itself can act as both an intermediate connector or a separator depending on a number of aspects. While there are some major benefits of music connecting people globally, the possible misuse of music also deserves attention.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 82
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 84
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s and tastes of their regular customers so as to ensure their profits. Lastly, it Is wor...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1847.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07417582418 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77665991743 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629120879121 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.4362637094 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.4375 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220362269651 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669728690619 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577841390808 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133715391609 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027844824106 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.