Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Music is seen as a method to bridge among people from various backgrounds. I completely agree that there is a magic power from music to connect individuals from different cultures and age groups.
There are several reasons why music can offer opportunities for people to understand others from outside of their homeland. Firstly, although the language may be the barrier, listeners can still appreciate the beautiful sounds of a foreign song. People can empathy the feelings, whether it is happy or sad, conveying by the singers from the lyrics. Secondly, many traditional songs containing rich historic and cultural meanings for the country can be used as an ideal way to show its development journey to foreigners. Finally, thanks to the Internet, a popular song from any corner of the world can easily be a topic to start a conversation. For example, almost all my Chinese and Australian friends can recognise the rhyme from Stupid Love these days and commend about Lady Gaga.
On the other hand, music can also help to eliminate the age gap between young and old generations. Some songs are classic and famous for decades, so everyone knows it regardless of how old they are. Take Yesterday Once More as an example, my mother has known it for twenty years or so and I play the song and enjoy listening with her sometimes. More often than not, there are stories behind the songs, creating chances for the elderly to pass them down to their children or grandchildren. Further, singing songs is a common habit for all generations and it can be a family activity linking family members closely.
In conclusion, everyone all over the world can be connected by music in spite of their ages and cultural backgrounds.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- When parents cannot afford the time to accompany with their children, they could choose to send their children to the child-care centre where many children have cared together; or they could send their children to an individual caregiver. Which one is bet 82
- Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Others however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- TPO 49 81
- 15 The key to solving environmental problem is simple present generation are willing to accept a less comfortable life for the sake of the future generation To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... old they are. Take Yesterday Once More as an example, my mother has known it for ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92783505155 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68429976279 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621993127148 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.9383601713 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124741706038 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492109076395 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491066611162 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964176129633 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546223400782 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.