Some people say that when dividing how taxes should be spent, the government should prioritize health care. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been suggested that governments should make health care a priority when it comes to deciding how taxes should be spent. I disagree with this opinion because I believe that although health care is an important part of public service, it is paramount to invest sufficient money in other areas as well.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that sufficient funds should be allocated to health care sectors. Firstly, adequate money in health care means fewer obstacles for prophylactic treatment research. When Centre for Disease Control developing the vaccine for H1N1, a type of flu common in pigs and contagious to human, a lot of money needed to be invested in research facilities and hiring experts of infectious diseases to prevent the public from being infected with it. Secondly, smooth running of public hospitals needs sufficient fund allocation from the government. In order to ensure that the public have access to affordable healthcare service, a large amount of money is expected from government so that hospitals can provide low cost treatment for their patients.
On the other hand, money from taxpayers are required by other public sectors which are as important as healthcare. The water supply network and power grip of a city need sufficient funds for their maintenance and upgrade from time to time so that citizens can have access to water when they want to take a shower and have their television on when it is time for their favorite program. What’s more, better public transportation requires significant investment as well. As the public transportation system is improving, the travel experience would be better too because of more comfortable seats and larger passenger capacity. As a result, fewer cars would be on the roads, and traffic congestions in cities can be eased.
In conclusion, I admit that providing sufficient funding to healthcare is important, other areas of public service should be allocated with adequate money as well.
- Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- 1111 11
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work while others think that it can be harmful for children What are the advantages and disadvantages of children doing paid work 81
- Some people think that it is beneficial for children to do paid work, while others think that it can be harmful for children. What are the advantages and disadvantages of children doing paid work? 61
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government，while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun obstacles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ly, adequate money in health care means less obstacles for prophylactic treatment re...
^^^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun cars is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...larger passenger capacity. As a result, less cars would be on the roads, and traffic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16822429907 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80020892429 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529595015576 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.016317761 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187455962293 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816222742896 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109159776075 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142673743685 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105009218673 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.