Some people think that advertising on TV is useless and others disagree Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that advertising on TV is useless and others disagree. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

It is often debated by many that advertisement on TV is useless, while others have a belief that it has many pros. This essay will look at both sides of the notion before reaching a concrete solution.
 
On the one hand, TV has been most effective media of advertisement in the recent years. Firstly, Television allows message to be conveyed in form of sight, sound and motion making ads most attractive, while other forms of advertisement allow only sight. This attraction force people to buy more and more products. Secondly, television reaches a much larger audience than other media. This helps in reaching the advertisement effectively to public with in a very short time. For example, a sudden rise in sales of local products in Pakistan is always observed after getting advertised on television. As this reasoning shows that it is worth to advertise on TV.
 
On the other hand, a handsome amount is required to produce ads, where one has to hire script writer, editor and video maker. Similarly, broadcasting of ads for longer time also require money. Similarly, TV advertisement once made can never be changed, and new advertisements has to be produce in case special offers and promotions. This reasoning shows that it is not good to broadcast add on TV.
 
To conclude with, with advancement in media and technology many ads are produced and advertised on TV. In my opinion, having very few cons like investment of money and on special occasions one can't change the ad, it is worth to get advertisement TV because of a large number of audience, and it has attractive nature as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-01 deep979kaur 68 view
2024-01-01 deep979kaur 56 view
2023-12-29 phuong cao 89 view
2023-10-10 tranminh1211 73 view
2023-08-08 hieu13092006 89 view
Essays by user tgbrfv :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n before reaching a concrete solution.   On the one hand, TV has been most effect...
^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...after getting advertised on television. As this reasoning shows that it is worth t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that it is worth to advertise on TV.   On the other hand, a handsome amount is ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it is not good to broadcast add on TV.   To conclude with, with advancement in me...
^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...t of money and on special occasions one cant change the ad, it is worth to get adver...
^^^^
Line 7, column 261, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...orth to get advertisement TV because of a large number of audience, and it has attractive nature ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, look, second, secondly, similarly, so, well, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83266425417 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9330804242 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7333333333 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21671143107 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704388222091 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400534267668 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134203611998 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362914533955 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.