Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like.Others believe hat they should only allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The widespread use of the internet has benefits in different aspects of human life. One of them is an innovation of education methods which has a significant impact on students. while students can learn a lot from teachers, I am of the opinion that the knowledge students absorb from other sources is greater.
Admittedly, teachers can give many useful lessons. The first thing is interacting directly with teachers. When there is a part of a lesson that pupils are confused about or need deep explanation, they can ask straightway teachers to solve the questions. This can be convenient and time efficient as students do not need a long time waiting for the answers. The second thing is students can learn from teachers not only the knowledge but also their own experiences. Sometimes, teachers while doing the lessons will come up with a circumstance in their life which is related to the topic of the lesson. they might share their stories, their or solution to the issues, therefore students can learn and put into practice.
However, the knowledge students can acquire from other sources can be enormous. As the internet includes almost every information, people can research and get answers in a quick and easy way. students can get access to lessons through videos on youtube or some education page in order to have a deep understanding about any topic. Because of the lively images, the explanation is clearer for students and after watching will have exercises to practise. Another thing is learning online, students can watch the lessons again every time as the videos will exist for a long time. Regarding some lessons that students have forgotten or old lessons that some points might be fading, they can search for the title of lesson and then re-watch the information. For example, website study24 on youtube uploaded videos about every subject and including detailed explanation for each subject, students can get access easily and find the information they need.
In conclusion, learning with teachers will provide real interaction and students can hear directly from teachers. but learning through other sources is a new way of learning popular these days which has clear information and can be watched again anytime.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...h has a significant impact on students. while students can learn a lot from teachers,...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... is related to the topic of the lesson. they might share their stories, their or sol...
^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Students
...nd get answers in a quick and easy way. students can get access to lessons through video...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...udents can hear directly from teachers. but learning through other sources is a new...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 7.85571142285 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1876.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09782608696 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65007935823 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.464390474 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7368421053 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3684210526 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126019989211 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446736044281 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233339847832 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0798101089277 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214665243935 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.