Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Attending university is one of the imperative ways in order to attain the necessary professional knowledge for students’ future career paths. Therefore, some people contend that students should be allowed to follow their own choices of majors; however, opponents stay that university learners should only be permitted to study fields which are related to science and technology since they are extremely supportive in the next decades. In my opinion, I strongly support the former idea because of several reasons.
On the one hand, there are various motives why some people believe that university students should only choose careers related to science and technological fields. Firstly, only by studying those developed majors can young people contribute significantly to the development of modern society. We do need more breakthrough in medicines, artificial intelligence, biological research and the like in order to tackle the current detrimental issues like overpopulation and environmental problems. Secondly, jobs in those sought after markets will absolutely help students earn a great number of bucks. Therefore, they will be able to live independently and support their whole families as well. On the contrary, a lot of people enter the market of science and technology also causes a remarkable abundance. Consequently, a host of scientists and technical employees will be prone to be unemployed.
On the other hand, to assure the balance of the workforce and students’ interests, students are encouraged to take part in majors that they like. There are other imperative majors related to education, agriculture, and services which need a large number of people. Therefore, only by letting students choose a variety of majors can we balance the job market in order to support different aspects of life and also improve society thoroughly. For example, if a country has a lack of farmers, there will be not enough food supply for both domestic and export purposes. Moreover, in terms of students’ hobbies, being allowed to study and work with the aspect that they like will create the most comfortable environment at work, which results in the increase of work efficiency, competition among workers and also creativity.
In conclusion, students should have the right to choose majors freely rather than science or technology since it will result in the development of almost every aspect of life. Therefore, teachers and parents should give them proper advice to reinforce their opinion of their future career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-08 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013 77
- The tables below give information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 73
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980- 2010 51
- The diagram below show some principles of house design for cool and for warm climates 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...n, agriculture, and services which need a large number of people. Therefore, only by letting stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44556962025 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96714476985 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554430379747 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.98035842 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.529411765 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2352941176 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5882352941 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361530911358 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102452725914 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827387971312 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217443456939 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776989672146 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.