Some people think that the amount of noise people make have to be controlled strictly, others say that people are free to make as much as they wish. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
In the contemporary world, opinions are divided as to whether making noise should be curbed or not. While some assert that it is acceptable for people to genrate noise freely, I believe that the amount of noise must be controlled at a tolerable level.
On the one hand, there are some justifications why making noise freely should be allowed. First, generating noise is considered as a recreational activity that soothes people’s negative emotions induced in daily activities. In particular, one suffering from hardships in life can vent his anger by singing loudly to his music of choice on the karaoke. In this way, loud noise acts as a remedy that can relieve all the stress from the burden in life and revitalize human’s energy. Second, loud noise is a way to connect people with mutual affection for music. For example, every evening on Bui Vien street, HCMC citizens from all walks of life gather here to create various traditional pieces of music and exchange their experience in playing musical instruments. This means that even the love for folk songs is able to bridge the gap between people and make them become one a close-knit community.
On the other hand, I believe that in most incidents, large amount of noise should be restricted. To begin with, the prevention of creating noise is a way to maintain residents’ health. In particular, people living near construction sites usually suffer from deafening sound of many building implements like diesel pile driver, anchor drilling machine and others.Therefore, if the government doesn’t take actions to curb the deafening and incessant noise from machines operating all day, people living in the residential areas near that construction site will suffer from hearing impairment and thus to deaf. Moreover, cacophony is regarded as a distracted element that reduces the productivity of workers. To be more specific, when artists or designers are working in an environment that is full of noise, they cannot fully concentrate on their tasks, which results in low-quality products.
In conclusion, although making noise optionally is agreeable to some people, I think that loud noise should be restricted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-23 | Limeluminous | 89 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. 73
- Today, the qualities of life of people in big cities are worse. What are the causes of this problem? Any measures should be taken to solve it? 84
- These days people in some countries are living in a throw away society which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away Causes and problems 87
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. 78
- Education for young people is important in many countries . However, the others think government should spend more money for education in adult population who can not read and write. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ontemporary world, opinions are divided as to whether making noise should be curbed or not. W...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ver, anchor drilling machine and others.Therefore, if the government doesn't take ac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 903, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which results in low-quality products. In conclusion, although making noise opt...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for example, i think, in conclusion, in particular, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22159090909 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9393841768 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.8209313318 49.4020404114 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.533333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258919402933 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905613527512 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707539427345 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184177649566 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587499202948 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.