Some people think the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars and motorcycles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
High levels of incident in roadway proves that safety of drivers be bad. Majority of people considered that one of the best method to decreased percentage of accident by setting limits of old to steer vehicle. I completely agree with this notion and think that youngster under old can not to driving vehicle in highway.
First of all, emotional of teenagers relative to changed. In other words, when someone in unstable made they can not focus to drive as a result many incident appeared due to juvenile. On the other hand, flow of development often made teenagers following wrong stream, the consequence is make curiosity more high and want to try new activities such as drunk, and cause an accident. For example, last month Liputan6 gived news about accident in roadway and the caused was from teenagers in boozy condition. Thats why, Adolescence is old where they growth and want to try another things even negative activities.
Secondly, government should make wisdom to all driver especially to have driver license. Each steerer prove their self by driver identity and to got it everyone must following every steps. Furthermore, ministry must have regulation to made sanction if someone break this rule. For example, in Canada, the teenagers can take test to got driver license if they was past writing test and this result can be accessed after 8 months. Thus, rate of accident in Kanada relative more slightly than another countries without this rule.
To conclude, It is the policy of every government to made regulation that obtained by every person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-08 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that the fittest and strongest individuals and teams always succeed in sports Others think that success in sports depends on mental attitudes Discuss both views and give your opinions 67
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the country side To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun incident seems to be countable; consider using: 'many incidents'.
Suggestion: many incidents
...they can not focus to drive as a result many incident appeared due to juvenile. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... was from teenagers in boozy condition. Thats why, Adolescence is old where they grow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, another thing, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01153846154 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54570935 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6583221962 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0580169983475 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196076247723 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028699175796 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378636725259 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467480012348 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun incident seems to be countable; consider using: 'many incidents'.
Suggestion: many incidents
...they can not focus to drive as a result many incident appeared due to juvenile. On the other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
... was from teenagers in boozy condition. Thats why, Adolescence is old where they grow...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, thus, another thing, for example, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01153846154 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54570935 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6583221962 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0580169983475 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0196076247723 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028699175796 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0378636725259 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467480012348 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.