It is believed that increasing the minimum age for drivers is the most effective way to increase road safety. While this approach can potentially reduce the number of road accidents, I maintain that imposing stricter punishments for traffic offenses and upgrading public transportation would be feasible solutions to address the root causes of traffic accidents.
Undoubtedly, raising the minimum age requirement for vehicle drivers can reduce the number of road collisions. In reality, young drivers who lack experience and maturity are more likely to engage in reckless and dangerous driving behaviors, putting themselves and other commuters in danger. Requiring individuals to wait until they are older to obtain a formal driver’s license can encourage them to operate their vehicles more responsibly and cautiously. This contributes to a safer and more secure driving environment. For example, some countries, such as Japan or South Korea, where the minimum age for drivers is high, have lower rates of traffic accidents involving young people.
However, increasing driver eligibility does not address the underlying causes of traffic collisions. Moreover, it is critical to note that traffic accidents can stem from various factors, including careless driving behaviors or poor transport infrastructure, not solely from young drivers. Thus, stricter penalties for traffic offenses, such as heavy fines or longer license suspensions for repeat offenders. Additionally, the government should invest the national budget in public transportation improvement, including providing more bus and train services. This will encourage citizens to rely less on private vehicles, ultimately leading to fewer road accidents. The Mass Rapid Transit System in Singapore, for instance, has significantly reduced the number of private cars by enforcing strict laws and penalties for traffic-based accidents, along with a well-established subway and bus system.
In conclusion, although raising the minimum age for drivers can improve road safety by limiting traffic collisions, it is vital to solve the underlying causes of road-based accidents through severe punishments for traffic offenses and upgrades to public transport. I am also convinced that once these measures are implemented, road users will obey these regulations, creating safe conditions for all drivers.
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the spending in million dollars per household in the US on five different products in 2010 and 2014 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966 1986 and 2006 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2018.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81556195965 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03821032123 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596541786744 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7413625341 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.533333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188353355686 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719499301073 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790434264611 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129647447824 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371527829083 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.