Watching television is considered as an effect way to acquire knowledge, because audio-visual information can attract students’ attention and engage their interest. Even , TV programmes have educational value，I argue that students should increase their screen time.
Television viewing will interfere with children’s studies and attending helpful outdoor activities. Children can get distracted easily by watching television, especially the situation without adult’s supervision. Students who watch television frequently may can’t able to concentrate on learning tasks and get a good academic performance. Meanwhile, these students are hard to join interactive activities which can improve brain development, such as reading, singing and communication.
Besides, long screen time have an adverse impact on social development. They might sit in front of TV for few hours and show unwillingness to talk with teachers and play games with peers. Then, they will become unsocial and be reluctant to express their opinions or understand others thoughts. Without good communication skills, they will have trouble in gaining knowledge, drawing upon the ideas of others and achieving succeed academically.
On the other hand, I accept that television can expose children to a world of knowledge. As a number of TV programmes are designed for students, these can help them gain an insight into other subjects. For example, historical documentary can be useful in understanding historical events, and foreign language channel can teach them to learn foreign languages. These knowledges can be a complement at school.
To sum up, the guardian of students shall impose restrictions on screen time instead of endorsing this habit. Long screen time will have a negative impact on their grades, rather than improve their academic performance.
- Some people think that children can learn efficiently by watching television. Therefore, children should be encourage to watch TV both at school and home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ttention and engage their interest. Even , TV programmes have educational value，I ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, may, so, then, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81617647059 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14953566904 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650735294118 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3226787034 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166731082011 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058487780959 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557933505484 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847559097999 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665364533884 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.18 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.