Some people think environmental problems are too big for indiviuals to solve. Others, however, think that those problems cannot be solved unless indiviuals take some action. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
At first glance it seems very difficult to draw a quick conclusion of whether a wide range of environmental challenges that we have been confronted are beyond the ability of average persons. After serious consideration, while I assume the environmental adversities are difficult to resolve , I would also argue that there are several solutions that human can probably adopt to enhance the environment.
Admittedly, it is reasonable for individuals who would debate that these problems are out of human-controlled. First of all, every year people have to face numerous nature disasters such as flood , hurricane, Tsunami or earthquake so I consider it is impossible to prevent the anger of the nature ' s mother.
Furthermore, there are variety of human-caused damages which are not easy to improve. For example, the oil spill which has been known as the large-scale suffocation of marine lives.
Nevertheless, citizens can adopt various solutions for augment the environment health. Firstly, people could enhance their own awareness for preserving our planet because the conscious is a crucial factor which can dominate our behaviour. Secondly, we should discourage private cars instead of that people can encourage public transports for limitating the vehicles' smog which can hover over and around our metropolises in order to cause the respiratory diseases and the air-pollution. Moreover, human can reduce disposable products and high-carbon goods because these items are hard to decay and harmful for the environment well-being.
From what has been discussed above , I could safely come to the assumption that while I agree there are various environmental challenges that human-kind could not fight against , I would simultaneously argue that human can get several daily action to enhance the negative health conditions of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-03-25 | Nguyễn Lê Anh Thư | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tal adversities are difficult to resolve , I would also argue that there are sever...
^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...veral solutions that human can probably adopt to enhance the environment. Admittedly, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... numerous nature disasters such as flood , hurricane, Tsunami or earthquake so I c...
^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sible to prevent the anger of the nature s mother. Furthermore, there are variet...
^^
Line 4, column 358, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...ge public transports for limitating the vehicles smog which can hover over and around ou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ng. From what has been discussed above , I could safely come to the assumption t...
^^
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that human-kind could not fight against , I would simultaneously argue that human...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52296819788 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13634143071 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.6755457096 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.090909091 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0923612249395 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357742072054 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0256076944179 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0475873698232 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0191372951257 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.