some people think that exercise use of mobile phones and computers badly effects teenagers writing and reading skills.DO you agree or disagree with the !statement.
Humen lifestyle is pampered in the lap of technology. Presently, it is argued that electronic gadgets has huge bad impact on teenagers reading and writing skills. Here I would like to accord with the given statement.
There are manifold points to support my point of view. First and foremost, communication by social sites such as facebook, instagram and many more are responsible to make students worse in reading and writing skills. For example, youngster use shortcuts and slangs abbreviation while chatting with their near and dear. Hence,writing skills are getting to be inferior. What is more, there are numerous auto correction software already installed in computers and mobiles and error can be rectified easily. Thus,they neglect the importance of spellings.
Further emphasis on my point of view. Tremendous influence of technology is responsible to make students bad in reading and writing skills. To Justify, teenagers interest in reading is overtaken by playing games on mobile phones, watching videos on YouTube simultaneously they give more values to vedios. Thence, reading and writing skills are falling rapidly. Moreover, in schools teachers teach the students through smart class project rather than using a formal way of reading and writing. Therefore, there writing skills are becoming worse. On the contrary, opposite wind is also there.
To commence with, the role of technology to enhance reading and writing skills is exceptional. To justify, limitless sites and applications are available where children can learn fruitful tips and strategies to increase their academic skills. As a result, blaming technology is good for nothing.
To recapitulate, technology plays a magnificent role to uplift the standard of life.Undeniably,we can not the neglect the importance of electronic apparatus. However, I still believe that school authorities and parents should try to improve the children skill in reading and writing
- Some think that private companies should pay for pollution clean up while others say it should be a government s responsibility Discuss and state your own view 45
- some people think that exercise use of mobile phones and computers badly effects teenagers writing and reading skills.DO you agree or disagree with the !statement. 78
- Some people believe that physical fitness of strong individual and teams is the reason for most sport achievements. Others think that mental attitude is more important. discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , writing
...chatting with their near and dear. Hence,writing skills are getting to be inferior. What...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , they
... and error can be rectified easily. Thus,they neglect the importance of spellings. ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Undeniably
...ent role to uplift the standard of life.Undeniably,we can not the neglect the importance o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
...o uplift the standard of life.Undeniably,we can not the neglect the importance of e...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55704697987 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95292861359 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593959731544 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8733489524 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8571428571 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1904761905 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04761904762 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224734092962 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579974280098 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058791297102 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122494491858 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563617994153 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.