Should foreigners pay higher money to visit the cultural and historical attraction places than people living in an area? Some people think that it is an appropriate thing for them to be charged more than local people, while others believe everyone should be paid to access any place at the same rate. In my opinion, I think that foreign people should be charged higher for two reasons: Their money can help to maintain these historic buildings, and it will encourage local people to visit their local attractions.
Maintaining the attraction places is one of the reasons for foreigner paying more than people in an area. Many cultural and historical attractions are destroyed by human activities and the environment every day. It means that if we do not maintain them, they will be ruined until we cannot recover them anymore. Therefore, we have to repair a broken part and hire people to take care of these areas, but everything concern about money; as a result, we have to find a budget to maintain all of the stuff. One way to get money is by foreigners. They have to pay higher for maintaining the areas and helping local people.
Another reason is to promote local people to visit the country's historic buildings for learning history. People will not go to these attractions provided that they have to spend a lot of money to access in that all of these places are boring for local people. It is not the same interesting as other places such as shopping centers, amusement parks, and so on. The government wants people to go there for learning about the history consisting of art, music, and culture in the area. Thus, they cannot charge people who live there to encourage them.
In conclusion, foreign people can help cultural and historical attraction a lot by paying more money than local people. Not only do they maintain these areas, but they also support local people to visit their great attraction. There will be better attractions for a long time should foreign encourage the areas.
- A university has money in its budget to do one thing to improve its facilities for students It can either improve the quality of the technology for example computers and printers that it provides for students Or it can redesign spaces where students 75
- The percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010 Sports boys 6 11 boys 12 16football 87 78basketball 35 78
- Some people think that to be successful you need to get in university education whereas others say it is not true Discuss both ideas and give your own opinion 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The diagram below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for change to the school site in 2024.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t, we have to find a budget to maintain all of the stuff. One way to get money is by forei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83139534884 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49636701957 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8738361077 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400757046481 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14693960471 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953493778165 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293076344392 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100255256517 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t, we have to find a budget to maintain all of the stuff. One way to get money is by forei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83139534884 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49636701957 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46511627907 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8738361077 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7647058824 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2352941176 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400757046481 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14693960471 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953493778165 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293076344392 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100255256517 0.056905535591 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.