Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things.
It is undisputed that arts and cultures symbolize the beauty and the values of a nation. Presently, some people opine that spending money in the promotion of arts and cultural programmes should be the priority of the government. While, others reckon that administration of the nation investing money on significant fields will be lucrative. Here, i would like account for both views with my own perceptions.
There are manifold points to endorse the former view. First and the foremost, investing money on cultural events is the need to show the essence of cultures and religions. To demonstrate, nowadays, people are fascinating towards affluent cultures and adopting the style of living, eating and wearing that are followed y the people of western countries. Moreover, people are becoming busy at their works and do not manifest their intrigue towards traditions. Therefore, cultural events is relevant to foster people to preserve their own values. In addition, art competition held by the government will be fruitful to encourage art work exhibition representing historic moments, monuments et.cetera. Consequently, people can aroused for the promotion of their own cultures and values. By contrast, others have conflicting views.
They think that the problem of unemployment, poverty ,education and air pollution is thriving and reaching to the top of table. As an evidence of this, about 60% people of Nepalese societies are still illiterate due to the lack of schools. So that, government should focus on these area foe the betterment of people. What is more, government should pay attention towards the development of tourism and trade sector to boost the economy of a country.
To recapitulate, undeniably, cultures and arts represents the dignity of the country. But, it is clear that, presently, problems above mentioned are the main issue which should be addressed by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-04 | binita karki | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-04 | binita karki | 78 | view |
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 71
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time. In there opinion children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences. 67
- Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled Discuss both views 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould be the priority of the government. While, others reckon that administration of t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ificant fields will be lucrative. Here, i would like account for both views with ...
^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat the problem of unemployment, poverty ,education and air pollution is thriving ...
^^
Line 5, column 277, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...ls. So that, government should focus on these area foe the betterment of people. What is m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3745819398 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93779157605 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585284280936 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3455569754 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2777777778 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346694387757 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844305410431 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590068552035 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176391280398 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485779114985 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.