It is irrefutable to state that water is crucial for the existence of life on the Earth. Few individuals assume, restrictions should be applied one the utilization of water, while opponents deem, inhabitants should be free to use fresh water. I, personally agree with the former view because according to me the laws should be implemented to limit the utilization of pure water.
To commence with former view, it is mandatory control the supply of water strictly because residents are so irresponsible. To illustrate, dwellers are using water blindly, if they see the tap is running then they do not bother to turn it off. In addition to this, underground water level is being decline so it can become a major threat for the future generation. Resultantly, it is necessary to execute laws or organise campaigns to educate factions about the importance of water.
Now discussing latter view, humans have right to access free water according to their need. To exemplify, since the majority of citizens opion that water is God-gifted, every person can use as much water as they want. What is more, the level of population has been burgeon. After observing increase in the population, it has become arduous for the masses to utilise water in limited manner. Eventually, water should be supplied to masses without any restriction.
To conclude, water is a pivotal part of the life of every specie. Not only it is vital to control the utilization of water, but also authority should provide awareness to natives about the total earth water remained for upcoming generations.
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 87
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 81
- People buy a product if it fulfills their needs there is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water as the resources are limited while others think we can use as much water as we want Discuss both views and give your option 87
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 266, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'burgeoned'.
Suggestion: burgeoned
... more, the level of population has been burgeon. After observing increase in the popula...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, while, in addition, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05363984674 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80939856669 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582375478927 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4474457345 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2142857143 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293495629139 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10381610863 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533455819752 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187084289264 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347152535708 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.