It is irrefutable to state that the technology has resolutionised the way of dwellers interact with others. In the present scenario, the majority of factions are preferring to meet digitally rather than face to face interaction. I assume that it is a positive development as it is a time-saving technique and individuals can socialize with foreigners.
To commence with positive development, it assit inhabitants to save their time. The people have hectic schedule due to their working life so socializing online with their lovedones is the best option. Resultantly, they can easily manage their time. In addition to this, masses can meet new people. When folks interact with new dwellers, they can enhance their communication skills. To exemplify, there are numerous applications like Instagram and Facebook where residents can talk to individuals globally, moreover they get some erudition about distinct cultures and languages.
Now discussing negative development, it can weaker the bonds with their dearones. Since meeting digitally will reduce the feeling of love, the relationship bonds will become weaker. To illustrate, in the yester years, factions were so emotionally attached with their nearones as compared to these days because people use to have small gatherings with eachother than interacting online. What is more, it will increase cyber crime. While socializing online individuals do not know the origial identity of front person, it can cause harm to them. Consequently, there personal information can be leaked.
To conclude, interacting online have both positive as well as negative impact on the society. Although it can weaker the relationships, yet it can aid inhabitants to come closer with people overseas.
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 89
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and it is positive or negative development 81
- Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water as the resources are limited while others think we can use as much water as we want Discuss both views and give your option 87
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 56
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...sent scenario, the majority of factions are preferring to meet digitally rather than face to f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s compared to these days because people use to have small gatherings with eachother...
^^^
Line 7, column 52, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
..., interacting online have both positive as well as negative impact on the society. Althoug...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52434456929 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03699826184 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1115289875 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7647058824 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197090948664 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581198370654 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067205048273 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130179129409 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682546871134 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.