It is irrefutable to state that countries are recognised under the distinct categories like developed, developing and underdeveloped. The affluent nations are becoming richer whereas impoverished countries are becoming poor. There multifarious causes behind this trend as the poor countries are not strong financially. Also, this can be resolved by encouraging citizens to work for their livelihood.
To commence with causes, the rate of crime is higher in impoverished nations as compared to affluent one. Because inhabitants are not able to come up with their needs, they indulge into criminal activities to support their families financially. To exemplify in Mexico, dwellers are mostly indulged into illegal activities because they are not able to find suitable jobs. In addition to this, poor countries are not having many funds. As the country do not have many funds, it is extremely arduous to provide proper provisions to the factions. Resultantly, it burgeons the rate of poverty.
Now discussing solutions, underdeveloped countries should seek help from developed countries. When developing nations will get aid from better developed nations, the living standard of the individuals will increase. Eventually, it paves a way to egalitarian society. What is more, government should inspire individuals to work to reach their basic demands. Few people do not work because they use to compare while the work is bigger or smaller. As a result, they face difficulties to fulfill their desires. To illustrate, in India, few masses have started to sell street food and attires to earn money.
To conclude, it is mandatory to clear the gap between rich and poor nations to provide superior life to the residents. Although poverty is the measure cause behind this problem, yet it is could be solved with the assistance of affluent countries.
- now a days more people are choosing to socialize online rather than face to face it is a positive or a negative development 89
- People buy a product if it fulfills their needs there is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water as the resources are limited while others think we can use as much water as we want Discuss both views and give your option 87
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 61
- Rich countries are getting richer while poor countries are getting poorer What is the cause of this What could be done to solve this problem ese countries need to implement policies that would help them accumulate the capabilities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ds. Few people do not work because they use to compare while the work is bigger or ...
^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...asure cause behind this problem, yet it is could be solved with the assistance of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38275862069 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9461859905 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.9572350358 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1578947368 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2631578947 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239535516899 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660562733372 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735828702128 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14277877587 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671369807648 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.