Some people think that governments in developing countries should introduce new technologies to people in order to improve the quality of life, while others believe that in order to achieve that governments should offer free education for all. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the contemporary world, people have different views about whether governments in developing countries should raise the living standard by introducing technical advances or subsidising whole tuition fee for all citizens. While in some ways it may seem reasonable to offer free education, I believe that introducing new technologies is the better way to enhance life quality.
On the one hand, free education benefits the quality of human’s life. With free education, children from disadvantaged background can have access to school, which diminishes the illiteracy rate and boosts up the knowledge for all inhabitants. Therefore, there will be more adroit workforce serving for the national economy. For instance, some developing countries such as Vietnam and Laos subsidised the free schooling for some regions, which yielded unprecedented and dramatic decrease in illiteracy and increase in economic growth rate.
On the other hand, I think the penetration of technology is the better solution to enhance national living standard. Firstly, technology is said to provide people with various information and news from all over the world. Were it not for the proliferation of the Internet and computers, human would not be able to obtain updated information with a click of a mouse. Secondly, technological innovations decrease labour capacity and increase working efficiency. When applying automatic cutting machines, farmers in rural areas of Thailand not only saved labour capacity but also improved the crop’s productivity. Thirdly, technology creates new means of communications, which connects people from distance places. For example, people detached by geographical barriers can communicate and make video calls with each other by using applications such as Viber and Zalo.
In conclusion, though free education can get rid of the illiteracy and improve the life quality, it seems to me that it would be better, for governments to introduce new technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-08 | Limeluminous | 89 | view |
| 2017-04-28 | limelike | 89 | view |
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- These days people in some countries are living in a “throw-away” society, which means people use things in a short time and then throw them away. Causes and problems. 84
- the line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in china between 1982 and 2006 94
- In many countries, more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally. Why people buy imported food?What could be done to encourage people to buy local food? 89
- The chart below shows figures for attendances at hospital emergency care departments in Northern Ireland by age group in December 2016 and December 2017 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64548494983 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08076319915 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5826788621 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0714285714 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355565394585 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102443580926 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680997999175 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21230795983 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755942241926 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.