Some people believe that the experts like doctors and engineers should stay and work in the countries they finished their studies while some say they should choose the place to work on their own. While each statement has its justifications, I strongly believe that professionals should be able to decide where they want to work.
On one hand, working at the place experts learned is a favorable method to apply what they've earned. Every knowledge and the way it is taught is applied in the most suitable way where they appeared, especially majors require high-quality and top-notch education. Moreover, staying in the same countries is more beneficial for them when they tend to get more opportunities to find a job or more familiar living standards.
On the other hand, the experts should be free to choose the place they chase to live due to freedom rights. They had to spend their own money or they tried their best to earn scholarships , therefore, it is unreasonable to urge them which is against their will. Another rationale, when they can choose the destination of their workplace, they will be living in the most beneficial environment and develop comprehensively. While knowledge is just one of many factors leading to accomplishment, living environment, relationships, cultures and people are the other crucial aspect of people's successes.
Although staying in the training place can lead to many plus points like favorable destination to apply knowledge, easier living methods, with a thorough consideration, free rights to decide the workplace can result in benefits which outweigh its opposite statement’s ones.
In conclusion, when professionals can choose whenever they dream to work, they will develop beneficially in every aspect.
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 67
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- the diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...ned is a favorable method to apply what theyve earned. Every knowledge and the way it ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ey tried their best to earn scholarships , therefore, it is unreasonable to urge t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98618289486 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553571428571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.1495950575 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.909090909 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4545454545 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0558676873954 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239208692901 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261223074106 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0327340547109 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0209592802689 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.