Some people think that hosting international sports events is good for the country, while others think it could have some negative effects on local people.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There are contrasting viewpoints about whether being a host country for international sports events could have negative or positive effects on local people. Personally, I believe that there are valid rationales to support both opinions; moreover, the government of the host country and the local residents should cooperate to make benefits outweigh drawbacks.
First of all, hosting international events, especially sports events, which have an enormous number of fans throughout the globe, could bring a loud and critical public eye on a worldwide scale to the host country. The country could manage to have good images and attention in cases where they provide satisfaction to the public. For example, a host country can be praised for its hospitality toward sports players and their fans. However, the public could also severely criticize the host country for anything they consider inappropriate, such as having poor preparations before matches. To make it an advantage, the government and the contract organization should have a thorough and deliberate plan for the event and run it smoothly and efficiently.
My second point is that international sports events could earn the country where they take place pros and cons economically and environmentally. Hosting a global event as such could help the country attract lots of foreign tourists, who massively benefit the incomes of local people by using their amenities or buying their goods and food. Nevertheless, the government could not control the amount of trash that was going to be dumped, which obviously does no good but harms the environment. In this case, the government, along with local merchants or even street vendors, should run advertisements or slogans to raise public awareness of how important it is to keep our environment clean and safe. The government could promulgate laws and punish whoever litters rubbish indiscriminately.
In conclusion, there are both advantages and disadvantages to hosting an international sports event. In order to make more pros than cons, the government of the host country, along with the company that is responsible for the event, and the home citizens should work together as a team to streamline the event.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-19 | ilovekitkat | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97826274522 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565714285714 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2246784403 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.5 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299735364252 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110168802053 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684386591956 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193141498051 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407730685686 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.