Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have had different opinions when it comes to sports while some say that it has more advantageous to take part in teams, while others think individual sports are superior to the former view. While I understand people’s concerns about individual sports, I still believe that games which require more than two to three players are more beneficial.
There are multiple reasons why people support individual games such as tennis and swimming. To comments with, individual games teach many skills such as critical thinking risk-taking ability, which are beneficial for individuals as they become more independent in their lives. When they learn all of these skills, they will continue to use them in different aspects of life, from studies to jobs. Research by Google, for instance, showed that over 85% of their employees who used to play tennis during their schools days, performed better in workplaces. Apart from this, they also applied many strategies with involved risks. Ultimately, it benefits the company. So these types of evidence indicate that people, those who take part individually in a sport, who become better people independently in their later years.
People who are in favor of team sports have their own justifications. If participants play in a team, they will learn about group work, cope with other's opinions. When they are in a team, they perform a particular task. Therefore, they give their full potential in it. In a survey, over 95% of big corporations in their offices put more attention on teamwork than individual tasks, which was a major reason for their growth. So, having a part of a group, a person becomes mote social and connect with many others and share his thoughts.
In conclusion, sports which require only one participant are provided many skills such as risk-taking ability and more, people become more independent. On the other hand, people who are in a team learn about shared work conditions, which involve less work than their former view. In my words, although individual sport is beneficial in many ways for human beings, games that require many participants are more advantageous than it. In fact, it provides many and useful lessons, which all will be helpful in many places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
- The graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 73
- The table below shows the percentage participation of women in senior management in three companies between 1975 and 2015 93
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The pie charts below illustrate the number of journal articles read per week by all students PhD students and junior lecturers at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 46
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, therefore, while, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10626702997 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64060393966 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544959128065 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2783939943 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6315789474 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325079418989 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100084159465 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982275156142 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226058559558 0.151304729494 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919586593525 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.