Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
There has been some debate and people has been saying it is best to study with other students. Whereas, there are many benefits to study alone, I would argue that it is more beneficial to study in a group.
On the one hand, it is very effective to study alone. People do not have to worry about the disruptor, who often being noisy and make a fuss every time. For example, if we work in a group with a disruptive person, it will be troublesome to concentrate on what to do or we can not get the work done. Moreover, people can be active about the time they study, which make it much more beneficial than studying in a group. When people study in a group, they have to depend on others in order to have a schedule. This is very complicated and time-consuming compared to studying by yourself.
On the other hand, it seems to me that study in a group is the best choice. Working with other people will help you develop new ideas which you have not thought of it before. For instance, discussing with others with an open mind will help you widen your knowledge. In addition, this will develop the skill to coop with other people, which is very useful for your future. If we are able to achieve this skill, if will help you to expand your relationship.
To sum up, while studying by yourself offers a lot of advantages, it seems to me the benefits of studying in a group outweigh them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Hoàng Thị Mỹ Phượng | 88 | view |
- The charts below show the number of magazines sold per person in five countries in 2000 and 2010 with projected sales for 2020 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 71
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, and Japan in the year 2009. 56
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate. 73
- The maps below give information about a school site in 2004 and the planning of the same school in 2010 70
- The two maps below show the changes in the town of Denham from 1986 to the present day Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s more beneficial to study in a group. On the one hand, it is very effective to...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ming compared to studying by yourself. On the other hand, it seems to me that s...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... help you to expand your relationship. To sum up, while studying by yourself of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.34749034749 5.12529762239 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41196883384 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498069498069 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.815251791 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.4285714286 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331081530323 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123755179748 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637031164712 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211733094731 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388734589362 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.95 12.4159519038 64% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.