Some people think that it is necessary to spend a large amount of money on constructing new railway lines for the very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different concerns over how the sum of government budget should be utilized. While some believe that governments should spend on railway lines, I personally believe that money should be used more on improving transportation system at first.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the railway system should be enhanced. First and foremost, trains are a cheaper, faster and safer mode of transportation which can connect to various cities in a fraction of time than buses or cars. As a result, trading industries can gain a huge benefit as goods can be transferred safely in a short period of time. In the same way, railways mode of transportation are environmentally friendly because they don't emit harmful substances like the level of fumes, carbon dioxide compared to others means that might result in increased air and water pollution. Furthermore, it minimizes the traffic congestion as a large number of people can be adjusted in a single train.
On the other hand, I firmly believe that improving public transport is extremely necessary. Firstly, the roads and streets of the cities must be upgraded in both quality and sizes which surely will reduce the number of unexpected accidents and moreover minimizes the traffic congestions. Secondly, the railway doesn't provide easy access to the same as buses and cars. Even though trains are cheaper, people need to reach the train station that might be far away from the house. Finally, spending on making spaces for the railway network in some countries would be more costly. To illustrate, in a mountainous country like Nepal, railway trails cannot be built on between large hills. Instead, ropeway can be an alternative to such a problem.
To conclude, although there are people who think that the railway network should be made better, in my opinion, I think that other modes of transportation should be considered at first.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-16 | Aasish Gurung | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ds can be transferred safely in a short period of time. In the same way, railways mode of tran...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e environmentally friendly because they dont emit harmful substances like the level ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 658, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... it minimizes the traffic congestion as a large number of people can be adjusted in a single trai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ffic congestions. Secondly, the railway doesnt provide easy access to the same as buse...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, i think, as a result, in my opinion, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10223642173 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76023916911 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5255713972 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311041228494 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100550612379 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715025492958 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200790619058 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498899084362 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.