Some people think that it is necessary to use animals for testing medicine intended for human use while others argue that it is cruel to do that.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Whether researchers should conduct experiments on animals for verifying medicine for human benefits or it is ethically wrong to do it has become the matter of discussion among masses. This essay intends to analyse both the perspectives along with my rational opinion in the ensuing fragments.
The proponents of former view opine that sacrifice of animals lives for protecting human life is significant due to this human can get long-term benefit while some people like animals that is why they are against it. Although, in modern era, scientists use computer programs for experiments to get desired results for longevity of human lives. However, these methods would not provide accurate information which leads to negative effects on human body. Moreover, some of experiments can only operate on animals that provide adequate outcome in the field of medicines.
On the flip side, there are few individuals who are fully against to use animals for testing medicine for human use. First of all, according to some people that in present scenario technology is booming and there are many computer programs which gives better results without harming animal's life . Consequently, the use of animals for testing medicines can be controlled via computer programs. Besides this, animals are beautiful creation of god and some persons love to keep pet animals at home. To elaborate, they never want to kill or hurt them for their personal benefits. To conclude, they are encouraging scientists and researchers to use computer for testing instead of animals.
To sum up, I pen down saying that aforementioned provide plausible explanation of both the views. Although, in my thinking, computer programs are helpful to test medicine however there are some cases where animals must be involved for testing medicine for saving human life as well as it would also prevent animals from dangerous diseases such as cancer and asthma.
- Some people think that it is necessary to use animals for testing medicine intended for human use while others argue that it is cruel to do that Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that it is necessary to use animals for testing medicine intended for human use while others argue that it is cruel to do that Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the experiments') or simply say ''some experiments''.
Suggestion: some of the experiments; some experiments
...gative effects on human body. Moreover, some of experiments can only operate on animals that provid...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ter results without harming animals life . Consequently, the use of animals for te...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uter for testing instead of animals. To sum up, I pen down saying that aforemen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, such as, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2671009772 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69275269982 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579804560261 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5406062596 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438500241158 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145670636692 0.084324248473 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940876513157 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258986158146 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05261009619 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.