Some people think that media should not report detail of crimes to the public.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, detailed reports of crimes could be seen on the media frequently. Some people suggest that government should take measures to ban contents regarding crime details to be shown on the media. Personally, I agree with this opinion, which I will elaborate further in this essay.
While it undeniable that giving detailed information about crimes has benefits. To begin with, it could arouse the awareness of the public of self-protection. By providing details of crimes, people will be more conscious of their own safety and try to avoid being the next victim. For example, people tend to avoid going to an area if they knew robberies and stealing frequently occurred there. Furthermore, in general, the results of judgement are reported alongside with the crime details. This would be a deterrent to some prospective law-breakers. Therefore, some might give up their illegal plans considering the consequence of committing crimes. Nevertheless, reports of crime details have more drawbacks.
Firstly, detailed reports of crimes have negative influences to social security. For those who intend to break the law but lack necessary knowledge and skills, they can be taught by the detailed information of crimes published on the media. Thus, they would learn how to plan and implement crimes, which would result in an increasing number of crimes. Furthermore, some criminals might get inspiration of how to escape from being caught by the police by the experiences of other offenders. For instance, a would-be offender could learn the necessity of covering his fingerprints when he saws a report of how does a criminal got caught by police because of the revealing of his fingerprints. In addition, some details of crimes are too cruel and make people feel terrified about their surroundings, some might even develop a distrust towards governments, which would impair social stability.
As discussed above, governments should impose prohibition on reporting details of crimes since it bring more disadvantages than advantages.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-11-19 | Shanti N | 92 | view |
2019-07-12 | lananhle301 | 84 | view |
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, however, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Some people think that strict punishment for driving offencesis th e only way to make road safer. Do you agree or disagree ? 73
- Many people are afraid to leave their home because of crime Some believe that more action should be taken to prevent crime While others feel that little action can be done to stop crime What is your view 86
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill elaborate further in this essay. While it undeniable that giving detailed info...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39811912226 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95789246904 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1800098334 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268229521407 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0922654828882 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668117517719 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184774390686 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481803713635 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.