Some people think that only the society should be blamed for any anti-social activities. what are the causes for these activities? Who is responsible for them?
Society is the seed of a person's personality tree and anti-socialism as a trait has roots deep down in society. The given statement asserts what can be the causes that the society is believed to be responsible for anti-social activities by some people? The problem is adverse and so is the complexity of it's causes. In this essay, I shall try to bring some light to the main reasons and present my opinion of the issue.
Firstly, to figure out the causes we need to enlist the most prominent areas of anti-social activities. As it is quite understandable that social media is the chief conveyor of information to all people of all ages. Hence, any post or picture promoting anti-social activities can greatly influence, not only the young minds but also the adults. People often, blindly start following what they see or hear on social networks, which accounts for there lack of awareness of the surroundings. Thus, social media and unawareness can be counted as major factors and also that the society is indeed responsible for these.
Another set of factors are those which have prevailed due to irresponsibility of the government. Education system is to be primarily blamed for such troubles. As these days more schools are just concerned about producing results, they often ignore the importance of social values and failures in life of a student. Young minds are more likely to indulge in unacceptable activities. Besides this unemployment, because of bad education system, has huge impacts on youth's psychology. They tend to take out their frustration of the government by wrong doing.
To conclude, I must say that society and government are equally likely responsible for the anti-social activities that have become so common. Hence, they should together try to reform and educate the youth for a better future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-19 | mann ramgharia | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | mann ramgharia | 73 | view |
| 2018-07-19 | Mampee | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives attendance figures for Grandville Stadium from 2017, which are projected through 2030 after a major improvement project. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some people think that only the society should be blamed for any anti-social activities. what are the causes for these activities? Who is responsible for them? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Society is the seed of a persons personality tree and anti-socialism as ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...minent areas of anti-social activities. As it is quite understandable that social ...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'youths'' or 'youth's'?
Suggestion: youths'; youth's
...d education system, has huge impacts on youths psychology. They tend to take out their...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, hence, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05629139073 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8994845503 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582781456954 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0656100672 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.8235294118 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439141994919 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116898843171 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121665610847 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255831403854 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888287680111 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.