Some people think that only staff who worked in a company of for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often thought by some individuals that the rank of a senior staff of a company should be raised. I completely agree with this opinion and I think that old people of the company must get a promotion.
First of all, I believe that the senior staff in a company is the most experienced one. They can easily adapt themselve to being in a higher position. They are very familiar with the policies and culture of the company. They don't need much time to understand the issues and problems of a firm because they are already well experienceand have passed many years working in that environment. For example, if a company hires a new employee, he will take enough time to get the issues and every company wants highly skilled staff due to which they take time to get promoted or to reach on that level where a senior can be in short time but juniors should also be promoted on the basis of their working skills. Inshort, senior staff is more suitable for promotion because of their experience and practicality levels.
Secondly, someone who is working in a company for a long period of time, knows technical issues of the firm, relationships with the other clients or companies and they also know the way to deal with them. So, its Advantageous for a company to promote their older employees and keep them working with them because if they don't get promoted they will try to switch somewhere else, amd on the basis of their experience they can easily get a higher salary. For instance, if an old employee of a company does not get a higher rank and another company offers them the same promoter rank with a higher wage then he will surely leave his job. So, promoting older staff on the basis of their experience and skills is the most important thing. Otherwise, they will leave the company and it would be a loss for the people as well as for the firm.
To conclude, I strongly believe that the older staff should get promotion because of their experience and problem solving skills indilink with the clients can help the company in their success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-09 | maryam_el20 | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | maryam_el20 | 56 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that only staff who worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Sharing information is the actual issue in the world where it is strongly affect people. Where as other people think it is a crime? What is your opinion. 56
- some people think that only staff who work in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher positions to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he policies and culture of the company. They dont need much time to understand the i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...licies and culture of the company. They dont need much time to understand the issues...
^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... who is working in a company for a long period of time, knows technical issues of the firm, re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... them working with them because if they dont get promoted they will try to switch so...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, as for, for example, for instance, i think, in short, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59239130435 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44097983634 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.459239130435 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0246556424 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305942756962 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117682422733 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575650562572 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198368938859 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593366127793 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.