Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
In one hand, many people think that teach children how to be a nice person of society was the responsible of parents. In the other hand, they think that is the work of teacher and school. From my perspective, I think it is must the responsibility of parents.
Teaching children how to be good members is easier than with their parents. Firstly, they have so many time with their children in their daily life to discover which factors is not good at their children. Such as, parents and children have a picnic on park together they can teach their children where they should throw the garbage and how to talk with older people, which can teach them to be a good behavior person of society. In some case, orphanage children who do not have parents can be easily to go wrong ways because they want to express themselves to another by playing drugs or joining a gang.
These days, both parents usually go to work all daytimes and school is the place where children spending their day in this. At school, teachers can help children to be good members of society by many lectures to teach make them have sympathy and a good behavior. And these lectures could be effective because it were researched and invented by so many professor, but not at all because in one class normally have approximately 25 to 30 members and teacher can not take care all of them.
In conclusion, both statements still have drawbacks and benefits. But in my point of views, I think parents should teach their children to be a good members of society was beneficial to children.
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 73
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home As a result employees will have more flexible hours in the future Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 99, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
...th their parents. Firstly, they have so many time with their children in their daily life...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun professor seems to be countable; consider using: 'many professors'.
Suggestion: many professors
...e it were researched and invented by so many professor, but not at all because in one class no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
...hould teach their children to be a good members of society was beneficial to children. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, so, still, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61010830325 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4725367954 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480144404332 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2569765904 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255264308595 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116538447475 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681604328925 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178218263108 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258926044139 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.58950901804 81% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 78.4519038076 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.