Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that people embarking their career early and keep pursuing it for a long time are more likely to gain job satisfaction than those who usually switch their job. Despite the benefits of changing jobs, it is my opinion that having a long-term commitment within a field is more advantageous.
On the one hand, there is a variety of reasons why staffs have a tendency of choosing to seek for new jobs. Firstly, it gives workers an easier access to master a wide range of vital soft skills. By doing this, they have ample opportunities to challenge themselves in different working environments, which afford them chances to build up their social network and a wide range of necessary job skills. For instance, some financial analysts who are extremely professional at analyzing financial statements and economic trends, may find it more engaging to learn presentation skill when they move to be spellbinders. Secondly, a number of seniors find suitable paths after failing at several first jobs. Let’s take a Vietnamese businessman – Quoc Anh as a telling example, not until the age of over 40, after leaving some positions as manufacturing managers in many factories, did he become successful with starting-up a retail outlets chain. Moreover, after some time working in a company, those who find it monotonous to continue staying in the current position may change their direction.
On the other hand, I believe that the better opportunity of professional promotion by committing to one company is more preferable. Initially, staffs are bestowed upon the chances to get fast-tracked promotion in their career ladders. It is undeniable that with longer periods of dedication for the development of the organizations, employees are more highly appreciated. This promotion method is applied in countries with deep-rooted employment norms such as Korea and Japan, where employees get fixed career promotion path based on their working time and loyalty rather than outstanding performance. Besides, they also earn bigger remuneration package to meet their needs such as luxurious cars or houses. Furthermore, committing with a job is conducive to strengthening employees’ prestige. Irrefutably, on the ground of deeply understanding about the companies they work for, staffs thoroughly aware of strengths and deficiencies of the businesses. Thus, not only could they contribute valuable ideas to improve the productivity, but they also give birth of crucious advices to enhance competitive advances . As a result, they mark themselves on other’s respect, leading to increase their job satisfaction.
By the way of conclusion, although switching jobs time at time can be advantageous in their own ways, I opine that people should be loyal to one organization for the professional promotion prospect which would bring them a satisfactory career and secure a better livelihood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 78
- Sicentific research should be carried out and controlled by the government rather than private companies. Do you agree or dissagree? 89
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... advices to enhance competitive advances . As a result, they mark themselves on ot...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2446.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 455.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37582417582 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12925303078 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 176.041082164 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602197802198 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 506.74238477 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8570097675 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.736842105 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15789473684 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180862372417 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499617957781 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627688895472 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127915468937 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0957041796314 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 78.4519038076 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.